Understanding: Frame of Mind
The ‘reality’ beneath ‘reality.’
We can know for sure that ‘pi’ in mathematics is the correct name for, what a human labels, mind. This is because zero and one is circumference and diameter (all of the 0’s and 1’s you ‘see’ around you). Explaining why what we ‘see’ around us does not tell us what we ‘need to know.’
Frame of Mind
That is, the ‘frame’ of mind is, always, this:
The ‘frame’ of mind continually presents, and, then, resolves, what a human labels, ‘reality,’ which is the conservation of a circle. Easily identified: ‘core dynamic in Nature.’ (Again, as above, the continual presentation, and resolution, of zeroes and ones.)
Yin and yang (ancient) is zero and one (modern), circumference and diameter of an uber-simple (always-present) circle. Explaining how, and why, every, and any, symbolic representation (thought) (intuition) (emotion) (abstract reality) (physical reality) articulates an uber-simple circle (plays proxy for a circle) (where every symbol is a proxy for every other symbol).
Symbolic Representations
This means the symbolic representations in Nature resolve to (and can only be expressed by) this diagram:
Remember, symbolic representation is both a noun and a verb. This is because the symbolic representation ‘circle’ is both a noun and a verb. Meaning, like any X and Y (0 and 1), you cannot have either without both. Explaining, succinctly, why the ‘frame’ of mind (frame of anything) cannot not be anything but the diagram.
An important reminder, then. You cannot have ‘and’ without ‘or.’ Explaining, again, why the diagram articulates ALL of the operations in Nature (in mathematics) (in language) (symbolic representations in general). The conservation of a circle (mind) presents, and, then, resolves, the number ‘two.’
No matter what we’re thinking (or doing), we’re always negotating, and navigating, between zero and one, and (or), zero or one (resolves to circumference and diameter, and (or), circumference or diameter). Where, from ‘pi’s’ point of view and and or are the same (they both represent the conservation of a circle).
Thus, the circle, as an operator, and an operation, explains everything in language, and everything in mathematics (everything in science).
Complementary Identity
For example, you cannot have day without night. You need both to have either. So, technically, they cancel each other out. This is called complementary identity. Explaining why, if you really want to understand what is going on around you, you have to use the diagram (because everything in nature depends on complementary identity) (it’s not possible to have one without two) (two is the most basic, and, technically, the only, number, in Nature).
Therefore, no matter what the ‘symbols’ tell us, we are all experiencing the same ‘reality’ (we are all, always, in the same frame of mind). (Everything is represented by the diagram.)
This explains why ancient religions, all of them, in one way or another, recommended ‘detachment.’
Detachment
‘Detachment’ means we ignore the symbols (we have been taught) (that are available by ‘observation’). Because we know, all of us, underneath it all, ‘observation’ cannot give us completely correct answers (for anything).
Explaining arguments (opposing observations) in all discipines (in all systems).
Conservation of the Circle is the core, and, therfore, the only dynamic in Nature. Known to all of us as ‘mind.’ Frame of mind, to be, technically, correct. Mind always presents, and, then, resolves, complementary identity (all disciplines) (all systems). Mind is, thus, the ‘reality’ beneath ‘reality.’
